Signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 10,2025, Assembly Bill 943 took effect on January 1, 2026, and California no longer requires insurance producer applicants to complete the state’s long-standing 20-hour pre-licensing education course before sitting for the licensing exam. The requirement had applied across property-casualty, life, and accident-and-health lines. What remains in place is meaningful: the 12-hour ethics and California Insurance Code course (which itself includes a one-hour insurance-fraud component) and the licensing examinations themselves.California’s move is not an outlier, the state joins 33 other states and the District of Columbia that have already eliminated the mandate, shifting the primary gate to licensure from classroom seat-time to the exam.

The rationale, advanced by co-sponsors NAIFA-California and the Association of California Life & Health Insurance Companies, is that pre-licensing hour requirements have not been shown to improve exam performance, and that states repealing them have reported no measurable decline in pass rates because most candidates still purchase study materials voluntarily. Supporters also frame the change as lowering barriers to entry and broadening access to the profession. It is part of an unmistakable deregulatory wave: Pennsylvania’s Act 142 removed that state’s pre-licensing requirement, with a compliance transition running through April 29, 2026, and NorthCarolina’s House Bill 737 ended its 40-hour coursework mandate, with comparable bills active in other 2026 legislative sessions.

‍

For compliance and licensing teams, the practical consequences are more nuanced than “one less requirement.” Reciprocity means the lowest-common-denominator effect travels: a producer licensed in a state with no pre-licensing requirement can often obtain a nonresident license elsewhere with little additional education, so a carrier’s distribution force may increasingly include newly licensed producers who never completed formal foundational training. Consumer advocates, and a widely circulated November 2025 Kiplinger analysis, have cautioned that “licensed” can no longer be assumed to signal baseline product knowledge. Because the exam and the surviving ethics and fraud requirements now carry more of the weight, firms should not misread the change as a reduction in their own onboarding and supervision obligations.

The prudent response for carriers, MGAs, and agencies is to treat internal training as the new floor. That means strengthening new-producer onboarding, product-specific education, and supervision programs to fill the gap the state has vacated, and documenting that training as part of a defensible market-conduct posture. Firms operating across state lines should also map which of their jurisdictions have dropped pre-licensing, so onboarding standards are applied consistently rather than defaulting to each state’s now-lower statutory minimum.

‍